Rome: "Affittopoli or Mercatopoli or liberalizzopoli?" As a right
investigation against the privileged can be reached to beat tenants.
The position and the proposed Tenants' Union of Rome on the
events that have affected the management of public property or quasi
On the print campaign underway in Rome, but also in other cities
as Milan, which showed the presence of tenants in excellent
housing authorities, local health authorities, communities, regions, particularly in areas of merit or
central, the Tenants' Union believes that scandalous celebrity or privileged to
regardless of the fee paid, or semi-dress in public housing is
in the suburbs and in areas of great value.
The Tenants Union believes that the VIPs or preferred plus incomes
high should get out of public housing or quasi-public and that everyone, and
repeat, all units must be allocated or leased exclusively
through calls to indicate in a clear and transparent requirements
who can participate in the selection of location, income, the reasons for revocation
allocation, the contractual period etc..
These rules should apply to the estates of non-residential construction
public: county, municipality, IPAB, hospitals, institutions such as the Sant 'Alessio
, professional speakers, such as accountants and Inarcassa cash.
would indeed be a contradiction if this campaign to end the effect sortisse
to lead to increases in the fee for thousands of ill- normal families
and the consequent eviction of hundreds of low-income families, or a colossal
disposal of such property which would result in the
precarious population of normal families that they live and instead "buy"
just for VIPs and those who wanted to denounce the privileged.
Our union can not accept it passively in front of tens of
thousands of families in the ranking, eviction of thousands of low-and middle
income, there are people who only have access to knowledge and ammanicamenti
and semi-public housing.
We ask, therefore, strongly, which is drawn from the public and semi
IPAB and cases, but also to the professional discretion in
choice of conductors in the new locations of housing, determination
fees and criteria of staying.
If, as they call all the newspapers, it is scandalous that the privileged have
obtained these case, then who should get such a property? If you have
go, as we say, to ordinary people with low and middle income households, it
clear that the fees that can not be compared to the income of families
normal, so as required by union agreements.
We do not accept the reasoning behind the current press campaign:
"because we are privileged with rents below the market or
fees with a great discount, then leave that well but compared to the fees
the market. "
in the houses of public and parastatal agencies, as well as the homes of common
region, IPAB etc, there are not only the VIPs, and the fees should not chase a
market excludes the right to housing families in need, but must
moderation by a market that in recent years has gone mad.
entities mentioned in the newspapers these days, incidentally, are entities that do not
have signed agreements with the unions, and in these days are sending
dozens of letters of eviction to families in economic difficulty,
requesting the release "within five days" to make way for new tenants more
rich. That 's what you want?
Over the past 10 years we have signed, along with other unions
tenants, dozens (perhaps hundreds) of agreements with public, semi
and private for the determination of a rent bearable for over
50,000 normal families. In all cases where we have signed the agreements
delinquencies dropped substantially, as well as evictions for termination,
eliminating possible new housing emergency, if these agreements were
benefit a minority of VIP is not the fault of the agreements but the person who
given their location in this room and still keep the same.
It is no coincidence that, despite our repeated requests, no entity has ever
formalized agreements with us on how to access to new locations.
Some privatized entities have refused to sign agreements with
unions and the result? Hundreds of evictions for termination, eviction
for arrears, empty homes because leased to high prices (cash only
Lawyers for more than 4 months can not rent more than 20 apartments released
on the market at more than 1,000 euro per month), resulting in emergency housing and
social conflict. Where on the contrary we have signed agreements there
have been cases of evictions for rent arrears.
The question must be addressed in a comprehensive home making her exit from
causing scandal and sensationalism in order to avoid deleterious liberalizzopoli.
The Tenants Union provides in summary that:
• All housing units for residential use of the assets of non-erp
property of the region, Common IPAB and privatized entities and cases professional
be rented only to families participating in tenders
public in which they are given the income limits for participation,
income limits for the stay Accommodation includes the contract period, the
number of available accommodations, the fee that must be related to income,
sanctions for local governments or agencies or other entities privatized,
applied in If housing was not assigned based on
the invitation list for social housing accommodation.
• Let the canceled all the leases to be related to
individuals or families who do not have the requirements of the notice
public allocation or stay in such accommodation;
• The region with a special law and after consultation with the tenants' common
determines the procedures and criteria for allocation and the stay in
ERP housing is not social housing.
• Are suspended all plans for the sale of housing owned by the region,
common IPAB;
• ; Both stated the obligation for banks to enter into business agreements
supplements for the renewal of contracts under the Law 431/98 Art. 2
paragraph 3.
0 comments:
Post a Comment